|How tai chi is taught in modern times|
classes taijiquan self defence qigong tai chi for health about us reviews a-z
Japanese martial arts
Japanese martial arts are usually taught in a very methodical, thorough way. There is a clear syllabus, steps of progress, grades and some degree of ongoing continuity.
Treated as a product, a cultural treasure, a sport or an educational endeavour, Japanese martial arts measure up well under scrutiny.
In a Japanese class the student is encouraged to replicate the teachings of the art perfectly. Like a carbon copy.
Chinese martial arts
Chinese martial arts are not taught like Japanese arts. By comparison there can often seem to be no discernable syllabus, no continuity and a generally haphazard approach to teaching the syllabus.
If indeed a syllabus actually exists.
Some of you have
talked about learning a short form of taijiquan, which has certain
transitional motifs eliminated. The reason for these repeating transitions
is to help you flow within the form - to ride over it without thinking. When
these repetitions are cut out, some of the major movements become awkward
and jam together. The sequence loses some of its smoothness.
(Chungliang Al Huang)
Why is tai chi taught this way?
Cultural differences. Chinese martial arts usually a family or village art used for self defence. Sharing with outsiders was not encouraged.
Progress was contingent upon hard work and how well you got along with the teacher.
Traditionally, in China a martial arts instructor was very reluctant to take on new students. How come? If the student's skills were inadequate it would directly reflect on the teacher.
On a mild level, this made the teacher look incompetent and affected their reputation. More seriously, it could mean that the teacher would be put to death for failing in their responsibility.
Consequently, traditional tuition tended to be harsh and severe. The teacher hammered the student and adhered strictly to Confucian terseness.
Sifu Waller's teacher (Peter Southwood) followed this method.
Historically, there was no call to teach tai chi publically or to adhere to a recognised system or standard of teaching. Teachers did whatever they saw fit.
In recent years a number of tai chi teachers have sought to introduce a more systematic approach. This is highly commendable but has certain drawbacks.
We strongly encourage you to read The Sword Polisher's Record by Adam Hsu for further insights.
Ideally a taijiquan class should have a syllabus akin to a Japanese martial arts school. There are many facets of the internal martial arts that need to be studied in a disciplined, clear, uniform manner...
The list includes:
Martial principles & practice
The Tai Chi Classics
All of these skills can be taught
methodically. Failure to teach fundamental lessons
in a comprehensive, consistent manner is simply bad teaching.
Stuart Alve Olsenís book Steal My Art is about his experiences learning taijiquan from T T Liang. Liang would not simply give the art away to people.
He expected his students to be like thieves: sneaky, cunning, observant and resourceful.
Sifu Waller combines traditional values with modern teaching. We provide detailed lessons, a reading list, a website and handouts. But these things cannot contain the complete art.
The student is still required to join the dots for themselves.
Confucius believed that a student must show a high level of initiative:
Waiting to be told what to do shows no initiative at all
Finding things out for yourself shows initiative
Figuring things out for yourself shows a high level of initiative
The internal martial arts
encourage students to find their own way, recognising that some lessons
simply cannot be taught.
There are many lessons that cannot be taught. Many teachings are akin to Zen koan. Attempting to explain the material coherently is not so easy, but a direct physical application proves the point nicely.
If somebody gives you the answer to a koan, do you really understand at all? Many things in life are only fully understood when you figure them out for yourself.
A student may be given all the necessary training in order to defend themselves yet still falter under pressure.
A student may be offered every piece of a puzzle and never succeed in putting the parts together correctly. We are all different, and our capacities differ.
The flexibility of the Chinese martial arts allow for this. They also recognise that some students may just never 'get it'. To quote the homily: "You can lead a horse to water but you can't make it drink."
Learn from Japan?
Too much structure and an art can be become rigid; physically and mentally. Too little guidance and framework, and the tai chi can fold in on itself; becoming worthless.
Taijiquan classes in the 20th Century fell prey to bad teaching, little or no syllabus, no testing of skills, and low standards.
Unfortunately, teaching methods vary from class to class, with each instructor essentially teaching as they see fit. This can be good sometimes. It can also mean sporadic progress, if any.
Whilst a Japanese martial arts teaching approach does not entirely suit tai chi, it does offer some valuable lessons in terms of consistency and continuity.
18 March 1997
Last updated 28 January 2020