classes taijiquan self defence qigong tai chi for health about us reviews a-z
Grades or belts?
Taijiquan tends to be taught by grade rather than by belts. Beginner, intermediate, experienced, advanced, expert, master. Belts could be used, but seldom are.
Remember that belts were invented by a Japanese Judo instructor teaching in France in the early 20th Century.
They have no historical/traditional significance and were intended as a learning tool not a status symbol.
When you get a black belt
ranking it doesn't mean you've gotten a foot in the door. It means you have
learned how to find the doorknob.
Chinese martial arts sometime use belts, sometimes not. It depends on the individual system/style/school. If belts aid learning, then they are useful. If not, they are just fabric.
It is difficult to compare a taijiquan syllabus to an external martial art because the material being explored is fundamentally different. How so?
In taijiquan, the initial concern isn't combat. It is health, fitness, composure, concentration and the cultivation of whole-body movement. The latter in particular is unique to the internal martial arts.
Performing a technique/application/movement using aggression, muscular tension, force and isolated limb movement simply isn't the taijiquan way.
A taijiquan grade contains a lot more material than an 'external martial arts' belt does. Much of the training is not directly about combat.
Rather, it underpins the use of the body and this is then utilised when fighting.
An external martial artist might pass their yellow belt in just 3 months, whereas a taijiquan student could take over 6 months to complete the beginner's syllabus at a basic level of competence.
Taijiquan students learn how to move first, then fight later. This means that their learning curve is quite different to the external martial arts. Martially, taijiquan students do very little fighting at first.
But this changes as they become more advanced - both the body use and combat concerns start to become increasingly sophisticated.
Topics such as jing and neigong require an immense amount of study.
an art where all the principles of other martial arts have been turned upside
They practice fast, we practice slow.
They practice hard, we practice soft.
(Cheng Man Ching)
The external martial arts often plateau at a certain stage. A block is a block is a block. There are no new insights to explore. This is not a bad thing. Their chosen art is usually still very effective.
People may get better but there is often little to discover as the student attains the higher ranking belts.
Taijiquan fighting method
There are no plateaus in taijiquan. If a student fails to make continual on-going progress, then the fault lies either with their teacher's limitations or their own personal attitude/approach.
Taijiquan was designed to be a journey without a destination. You just keep going. There is no conclusion. No end point. No certificate, trophy, reward or belt.
Consider judo belts...
A judo student attends lessons 2-3 times a week, passes a belt every 12 weeks and usually passes all of the coloured belts within a couple of years. This is standard practice in most martial arts.
The typical martial arts expectation of passing a new belts every few months simply doesn't translate to taijiquan.
Usually the students are adults, whereas most external martial artists start out as youngsters.
Taijiquan adults won't usually attend 2-3 times a week, nor pass a belt every 3-6 months, nor reach black belt anytime soon.
In lieu of the mainstream martial arts level of commitment, taijiquan students tend to do less and expect more. They make excuses: job, family, commitments, you name it...
And they still expect to move up a grade. When the higher rank is not forthcoming, students resent their teacher.
As you like it
Taijiquan students who continue training long term tend to work at a pace that suits their own personality.
They may have lofty aspirations/ambitions, but these are tempered by the reality of who they are and how committed they are. This is quite a Taoist way of being.
18 April 1994
Last updated 19 November 2018